Blog

Charity finance policy Financial sustainability

25 September 2017, 15:01

Government no longer has the luxury of ignoring charities

Charity Finance Group has made two submissions to the Chancellor’s Autumn Budget. One alongside a coalition of other representative bodies. The other, on our own, regarding charity tax reform. ...

Post byAndrew O'Brien

Where next?

Events »

Thursday, 27 June 2019
Northern Conference 2019 More »

News »

Wednesday, 19 June 2019
BEIS Independent Review of the Financial Reporting Council More »

Charity Finance Group has made two submissions to the Chancellor’s Autumn Budget. One alongside a coalition of other representative bodies. The other, on our own, regarding charity tax reform. Both have at their heart the same theme. Whichever way you slice it; the government has a lot of work to do if it is going to get the country ready for Brexit. The Prime Minister has said in her latest speech that she is an optimist on Brexit. She spoke in Florence of the ‘indomitable spirit’ of the British people that will see them through Brexit. You can decide for yourself what you make of the speech, but we would argue that one of the things that makes up the ‘indomitable spirit’ of Britain is the charitable instinct. The desire to help others than ourselves, whether that is through giving time, money or just raising awareness. If Britain is going to stand any chance of making a success of Brexit, in the way that the Prime Minister would like, then it needs to nurture and grow that charitable instinct and support the institutions that are agents for it, charities.

Let’s plan for Brexit now

On the back of her Florence speech, the Prime Minister is aiming for a two-year transition deal. Two years isn’t a very long time, and although we may not face a cliff-edge in 2019, it will still take the country a while to prepare for Brexit in 2021. Charities are facing increasing demand for services and any economic volatility that will come from Brexit will make that harder. Even if Brexit does deliver economic success, the root causes of the referendum result – the inequality and discontent with the current state of society – will still need to be tackled. The government has bought itself time, but this doesn’t mean that inaction is an option. Investing in charities and working with them now, will mean that the country is in a much stronger position regardless of the outcome of Brexit.

Tax reform is one of the best ways to support communities

Spending with the sector through grants is incredibly important, but spending isn’t the only way that the government can help the sector. As we have outlined previously, billions are being lost for good causes because of tax rules which do not reflect the modern charity sector. As we have highlighted in our response, there are a number of ways that the government can make changes, but we have highlighted three areas in particular where the sector can be supported:

Beginning work on how we can remove the burden of irrecoverable VAT
Exempting charities from Insurance Premium Tax
Increasing business rate relief to 100% by the end of the decade

The first proposal doesn’t cost the government anything, but it is important that as we negotiate our future relationship with the EU, we think about what we want to do post-Brexit. When we polled the public, 63% of respondents said that they wanted the government to use its new powers to scrap the burden of irrecoverable VAT. The government needs to show that it is focused on the future, and that it is using any new powers to support those that need help most. We have put together proposals for government on how to do this, but it is important that the government owns this issue, not just the sector. The second proposal is a cheap one in government terms, but it is part of a wider problem where tax rises take place without any thought for how they can impact charities and the people that they serve. The most recent rise in the Insurance Premium Tax didn’t even consider the impact on charities, yet for many charities, this tax is a significant portion of their spending. Insurance is required for everything, from maintaining community centres to supporting volunteering. Charities have an obligation to protect their assets, which leads to charities ‘gold plating’ their insurance needs more than in the private sector. Scrapping IPT for charities would also be in line with the government’s desire to bring IPT in line with VAT. The VAT system recognises that charities are different and there are various exemptions for different services that the sector delivers. Although this creates problems in the VAT system, an exemption from IPT would not create any negative side effects. It is also likely to help the smallest organisations the most, where insurance costs are proportionally a higher level of their spending than larger charities. Our final proposal is expensive, but it is an issue which the government cannot ignore. Charities often need physical spaces to deliver their objectives, whether that is surgeries, community centres, offices or anything else. The business rates system doesn’t make any sense as it currently stands. It is the only tax relief for charities where you can be better off in one area, than in another. Local councils are also cutting back on the 20% discretionary rate relief, meaning that in some areas millions of pounds is being lost to charities and services are suffering as a consequence.

What do you think?

There is more that the government can do, and we’d be interested in your thoughts. But the important thing is that it must do something. Charities are too big to ignore and the government doesn’t have the luxury of ignoring charities anymore, if it wants to deliver a successful Brexit. We will continue to make the case for change, but it is something that we must all do together. « Back to all blog posts

Blog

Government no longer has the luxury of ignoring charities

Let’s plan for Brexit now

Tax reform is one of the best ways to support communities

What do you think?

Related Content

Economic Outlook Briefing 2019/20

Charity Property Matters Survey 2018

Economic Outlook Briefing 2018

Charities need to find nearly £4bn additional income by 2020 finds CFG

Live Blog: Autumn Budget 2017

What should charities expect from the Autumn Budget 2017?

Could political instability create financial instability for charities?

Live Blog: Spring Budget 2017

IFS 2017 Green Budget – the good, the bad, and the worrying?

Three things for charities to consider in the wake of Trump victory

Saying what we want: Devolution & Voluntary Sector Summit

Tony Armstrong looks at Devolution: working with local organisations to transform public services

Devolution is our chance to advocate for the most vulnerable

How will the 'devolution revolution' be financed?

Caron asks: 'Why does the voluntary sector need a devolution summit?'

Post-Brexit Autumn Statement is first key battleground

EU Referendum: Keep watching this space…

EU Referendum: What could this mean for charities?

Hunting for the silver lining; the IFS, the economy and charities.

What did the Romans ever know about data protection?

What’s in local government’s Christmas stocking?

What do charities need to know about the Spending Review?

Tackling some myths on the Spending Review

Financial sustainability won’t be easy for the charity sector

Welfare and employment dominate the Budget: What does this mean for charities?

Budget 2015 – Missed opportunities and targeted giveaways

Vision for sector post-2015. What did the politicians have to say at the CFG Annual Conferece?

Managing in a Downturn Report Reflections....

2014, politics, and charities

BEIS Independent Review of the Financial Reporting Council

CFG Annual Handbook 2019

Brexit crystal ball

Spring Statement 2019

If it comes down to a vote on no-deal, vote against it, says CFG

CFG responds to the Charity Commission’s consultation on the SORP-making process

Charities are ill-prepared for a no-deal Brexit and fear the worst: CFG survey

Are you prepared for a WTO Brexit?

What the recent SCOTUS judge controversy can teach us about the Charities’ SORP

10 questions to ask before borrowing

The Brexit deal is bad for charities says CFG, as it urges MPs to vote against it on Tuesday

London Charity Property Survey Findings

London Charity Property Survey Results in Summary

London Property Survey Statistical Analysis

Increasing number of charities fear property poses risks to their charitable mission

Charity Finance Group's briefing on the Autumn Budget 2018

Live Blog: Budget 2018

Labour Conference September 2018 update - Brexit and Beyond

Brexit will be bad for both charities and beneficiaries, says new report from CFG

Cost Benefit Analysis Of Brexit For Charities

Large Charities Focus

Does the Civil Society Strategy deliver for charities?

Post-Brexit immigration rules could cause skills shortage in charities

The charity work force in post-Brexit Britain

“Who moved the cheese?” The case for innovation in the UK charity sector

Finance Focus May 2018

CFG Annual Handbook 2018

Apprenticeship Levy Guide

Spring Statement 2018: What should charities be looking out for?

Review: Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing Report - Extremism in Charities

A stairway to heaven on business rates for the charity sector?

What do the latest Budget 2017 economic numbers mean for charities?

Serious but still lacking substance – Labour Party Conference 2017

Autumn budget submission 2017

Where are the ‘automatic stabilisers’ for charities income?

6 simple steps your charity can take to help protect themselves from fundraising fraud

Autumn budget submission

Local infrastructure needs more support if it is going to meet needs of small charities, finds CFG report

Why has CFG written a report on potential Brexit deals?

Charities could thrive with a ‘clean Brexit’ says major report

The government is in danger of ignoring social issues in Brexit talks

Celebrating small charities

Record Management Toolkit Launch Roundup

Charities must not let Brexit negotiations get away from them

The wealthy and business prioritised over disadvantaged communities in Brexit negotiations, say British public