Psychological safety is not a ‘nice to have’. It is the foundation of how well any team performs, communicates, and recovers from difficulty. When it is present, people are more engaged, more honest, and more committed. When it is absent, problems are hidden until they escalate, mistakes go unreported, and people disengage quietly — or leave.
| |
DEFINITION: Psychological safety is a feeling that you can speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes, and share ideas without fear of embarrassment, rejection, or punishment. It strengthens productivity, performance, and employee wellbeing, and helps organisations retain people and stay competitive.
|
Psychological safety is not a ‘nice to have’. It is the foundation of how well any team performs, communicates, and recovers from difficulty. When it is present, people are more engaged, more honest, and more committed. When it is absent, problems are hidden until they escalate, mistakes go unreported, and people disengage quietly — or leave.
A webinar delivered by MHFA England as part of My Whole Self Day, drawing on work with over 200 organisations since 2020, presented some striking findings about the current picture nationally:
- Since 2020, there has been a 25% drop in the number of people who feel they can bring their whole self to work — down to just 41% in 2026.
- 1 in 3 employees do not feel safe asking for help at work.
- Nearly half (49%) do not feel safe expressing what they need to work at their best.
- 45% do not feel safe pointing out mistakes or raising risks.
- 15% say they have made preventable mistakes because they did not feel able to speak up.
These are not abstract concerns. They translate directly into operational risk, poor decision-making, and avoidable harm — to people and to organisations.
Why leadership is important
One of the clearest findings from the research is that psychological safety depends heavily on direct line management. The tone set by a team's manager — through how they respond to concerns, how they handle mistakes, and whether they model vulnerability themselves — shapes whether people feel safe. This makes psychological safety a leadership and management responsibility, not just a cultural nicety.
When psychological safety is low, the consequences are often invisible at first — shorter responses, less proactive communication, ideas that never get raised — before they become visible as missed risks, escalating mistakes, low morale, and staff leaving. Organisations where people feel safe to speak up see staff honesty translate directly into better customer outcomes and consistently higher-performing teams.
The example of Nationwide Building Society was highlighted as an indication of what good looks like in terms of creating psychologically safe environments. Their Minds Matter employee network, set up in 2021, focuses on providing a safe space for employees to talk about mental health, reducing stigma, and providing crisis support. The network now has over 1,350 members, and over 300 conversations were recorded in 2024, with interactions ranging from support with stress, anxiety, and depression to crisis first aid.
When psychological safety is high, teams are proactive rather than reactive. When it is low, decisions are made with incomplete information because the people closest to the work do not feel able to contribute fully.
| |
NOTE: Currently, 33% of managers feel 'out of their depth' supporting their team's mental health, and only 29% of organisations provide mental health training for managers. This is a gap we should be actively working to close.
|
What gets in the way and what to watch out for
Poor psychological safety often shows up in subtle ways before it becomes obvious. Leaders should be alert to:
- Team members giving shorter answers or becoming less forthcoming in meetings
- People avoiding raising concerns or volunteering ideas
- A pattern of 'I'm fine' responses without substance
- Issues surfacing late, after they have already escalated
- People working through illness or burnout without flagging it
In the session, attendees shared that people are increasingly turning to AI tools to discuss burnout and mental health concerns because they do not feel comfortable raising these with their line manager. Others described working through serious illness because they felt unable to speak up. This is the reality of what low psychological safety looks like in practice.
In remote working environments particularly, these signs are harder to spot. Regular, genuine check-ins — asking twice, noticing patterns, and creating structured space for honest conversation — become even more important.
How leaders and managers can build psychological safety
Building a psychologically safe environment is not about grand gestures. It is built through consistent, everyday behaviours. The following are evidence-based actions that managers can take:
Model vulnerability
When leaders are willing to say they are having a difficult day, acknowledge uncertainty, or admit they do not have all the answers, they give their team permission to do the same. Projecting constant resilience and expecting others to 'push through' creates a spiral of hidden stress and eventual underperformance.
Listen — and be seen to act
When someone raises a concern, the response matters enormously. Not being defensive, not dismissing what is raised, and crucially being seen to take action builds the 'trust bank' that makes people more willing to speak up again in future. People noticing that their voice has made a difference is one of the most powerful drivers of psychological safety, particularly early in someone's career.
Talk openly about mistakes
Normalise the discussion of what went wrong and what can be learnt, rather than assigning blame. This is particularly important in a culture where you want people to flag risks early.
Know what support is available — and how to signpost it
All managers should be confident in their knowledge of the mental health and wellbeing support available within and outside of the organisation and how to direct people to it.
Create a distinction between freedom and safety
There is a meaningful difference between people having the theoretical freedom to speak up and people knowing that they can speak up without negative consequences. Both are needed. The goal is an environment where having difficult conversations feels normal, not exceptional.
Be proactive, not just responsive
Psychological safety does not emerge spontaneously. It needs to be built deliberately — through early conversations, through structured tools like a 'plan for working well', and through consistent, genuine check-ins. Retrospective attempts to repair trust after it has broken down are far less effective than proactive relationship-building.